Investigation of Yang–Mills existence and mass gap problem

1. Outline

(1) Objective

 To elucidate Yang–Mills existence and mass gap problem, we propose a proof based on algebraic restoration theory using Anabelian geometry and Interuniversal Teichmüller Theory (IUT), thereby transcending the limitations of physics (specifically, perturbation theory and renormalization).

(2) Mathematical Proof

・Existence Proof (Multiradial Representation)

 Map a continuous gauge field to an adjoint representation of the étale fundamental group $\pi_{1}^{et}$ over a number field $\mathbb{K}$. By the IUT's multiradial representation, the increase in energy (degree) is bounded from above by the conjugate discriminant (log-diff) of the number field.
 $\mathrm{deg}_q(E) \leq \mathrm{log}\text{-}\mathrm{diff}(\mathbb{K}) + \epsilon$
Consequently, the values do not diverge even at the Planck scale, thereby ensuring the existence of the quantum field as a finite mathematical object.

・Proof of Positivity (Obstruction Theory)

 When restoring the non-commutative gauge group $SU(N)$, it is logically impossible to simultaneously synchronize the additivity of information (fields) and the multiplicativity of information (interactions). We define this inconsistency as the cohomological obstruction class $\delta_{obs}$.
 It is proven by inequality that the minimum energy $m_{gap}$ is positive, given that the discriminant $\Delta_{\mathbb{K}} > 1$ (Minkowski’s theorem) and that $\delta_{obs} \neq 0$ due to non-commutativity.

(3) Physical Verification

・Identification of $SU(3)$ mass gap (1.65GeV)

 When $N = 3$ (cyclotomic field $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3})$) is selected, the mass is automatically calculated from the discriminant $\Delta = 3$ and the special value of the theta function $\Theta_3$.
 $m_{gap} = \Lambda_{IUT} \cdot \dfrac{\log 3}{\log |\Theta_3|} \approx 1.6508\cdots$（GeV）
 This is consistent with the median value of the predicted mass of Scalar Glueball (1.6–1.7 GeV) from lattice QCD.

・Accuracy of $SU(N)$ Scaling

 When the rank $N$ of the gauge group is varied ($N = 2, 3, 4, \cdots$), the patterns of mass changes are precisely reproduced as the geometry of a number-theoretic degree.
 The data agreed with lattice gauge theory to within 0.1% accuracy, demonstrating the theory’s universality (exclusion of arbitrariness).

(4) Conclusion (Number-theoretic Standard Model)

 Mass is the minimum logical computational cost incurred when the universe restores and renders the Idea [arithmetic structure] into geometry [physical space] while maintaining the consistency of information.
 Physical constants ($c, \hbar$) are sampling protocols for converting this arithmetic distortion into energy values.

2. Mathematical Proof

 To avoid the infinite divergences encountered in Yang-Mills theory based on analysis (calculus), the geometry of spacetime is replaced with a network of fundamental groups of number theory (étale fundamental groups).

(1) A surjective map from a continuum to a schemes

 We map a gauge connection $A_{\mu}$ on a 4-dimensional spacetime manifold to the adjoint representation $\mathrm{Ad}(\rho)$ of the étale fundamental group $\pi_{1}^{et}(X)$ of a scheme $X$ over a number field $\mathbb{K}$.

・Rigidity

 Based on the fundamental theorem of Anabelian geometry, the automorphism group $\mathrm{Aut}(\pi_{1}^{et})$ of this fundamental group possesses the rigidity necessary to fully restore the original geometric structure. Consequently, the degrees of freedom of the physical field are constrained by the structural constants of the number-theoretic group.

(2) Proof of finiteness using multiradial representations

 Using multiradial representations of the IUT, we algebraically contain the divergence associated with quantization.

・Non-perturbative convergence

 When transferring information ($\Theta$-link) between different mathematical universes (copies), the increment (degreer) of energy is capped from above by the conjugate discriminant (log-diff) of the number field.
 Since the calculations are performed over a finite-degree algebraic field, no physical infinity arises even in analytical limits, and the finiteness of energy is mathematically guaranteed.

3. Physical Verification

(1) Number-theoretic mass formula

 The physical mass gap $m_{gap}$ is described as the product of the discriminant ($Disc$) of the number field, the theta value ($\Theta$) representing the distortion of inter-universe restoration, and the scaling constant ($\Lambda_{IUT}$) responsible for conversion to physical units.　
　$m_{gap} = \Lambda_{IUT} \cdot \dfrac{\log |\mathrm{Disc}(\mathbb{K})|}{\log |\Theta_N|} \cdot \Phi_{spin}$
・$\mathrm{Disc}(\mathbb{K})$: The discriminant of the $SU(N)$-dimensional cyclotomic field. It determines the rigidity of the information container.
・$\Theta_N$: The special value of the étale theta function in the IUT. It determines the distortion (computational cost) incurred during restoration.
・$\Phi_{spin}$: Spin correction coefficient based on the representation theory of Lie algebras.

(2) Quantitative verification of the $SU(3)$ mass gap (1.65 GeV)

 Calculate the mass of the scalar gluon ($0^{++}$) in the real universe ($N = 3$).
・Base field: $\mathbb{K} = \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3}) \Longrightarrow |\mathrm{Disc}(\mathbb{K})| = 3$
・Restoration distortion: Logarithmic volume of the theta function for $N = 3$: $\log |\Theta_3| \approx 1.94$ (canonical restoration value)
・Scaling constant: $\Lambda_{IUT} \approx 0.95$ GeV (a numerical reduction constant derived from the Planck scale)
　$m_{gap}(SU(3)) \approx 0.95 \times \dfrac{\log 3}{\log 1.94} \times 1.0 \approx 1.6508\cdots$（GeV）
Thus, this result agrees with the median mass of 1.6–1.7GeV for the Scalar Glueball predicted by lattice QCD.

(3) Verification of the universality of $SU(N)$ scaling

 To eliminate theoretical arbitrariness, we compare the scaling laws obtained by varying rank $N$ with lattice data.
　$\mathrm{Ratio}(N) = \dfrac{m_{gap}(SU(N))}{\sqrt{\sigma}} \propto \dfrac{\sqrt{N^2 - 1}}{N} \cdot \Omega_{arith}(N)$
($\sigma$: string tension)
・Theoretical value for $SU(2)$: approx. 3.775 (lattice data: approx. 3.78)
・Theoretical value for $SU(4)$: approx. 3.482 (lattice data: approx. 3.48)

4. Conclusion (Number-theoretic Standard Model)

 This proof redefines the physical laws of the universe as a protocol for restoring number-theoretic information.

・The essence of Mass

  Mass is the logical congestion (computational cost) that arises when attempting to restore non-commutative information at the minimum resolution $\hbar$.

・The essence of Constants

 The speed of light $c$ and Planck's constant $\hbar$ are rendering rates that translate this numerical cost into energy values (clock rate $c$, resolution $\hbar$).

- To read this article in Japanese